Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 259%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics264% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive363% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory119.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 19:18
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1,217
107% 911 Pts
64-Core 2,157
134% 2,157 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 471E) ≥ 4GB; sapphire pulse rx7900xtx
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
264% Outstanding
Lighting 337
Reflection 445
Parallax 820
274% 534 fps
MRender 546
Gravity 322
Splatting 461
362% 443 fps
Poor: 216%
This bench: 264%
Great: 293%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30023 1TB
621GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2081 1925 1489 1247 1188 1229 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
363% Outstanding
Read 2,674
Write 4,267
Mixed 2,892
SusWrite 1,526
642% 2,840 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 108
349% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,372
DQ Write 1,046
DQ Mixed 1198
899% 1,205 MB/s
Poor: 233%
This bench: 363%
Great: 504%
Team XS2 SSD 120GB
55GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 108 110 108 108 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 435
Write 132
Mixed 160
SusWrite 110
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 21.1
71% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 85.6
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 103
80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$64
505GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 435 434 434 408 403 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 436
Mixed 411
SusWrite 424
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 49.6
163% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
152% 208 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
153GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 299 298 298 298 298 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 453
Mixed 410
SusWrite 316
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 56.2
186% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 218
164% 219 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
55GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 188
Write 68.4
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 59.2
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 24.5
88% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 80.5
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 72.6
54% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 63.1
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 40.2
136% 47.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 39.4
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 126%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 100 35" 1280 720 AUS3554 ASUS VG35V
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,676
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback