Gigabyte GA-H410M S2 V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H410M S2 V3  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 16:00
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 247
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 646
68% 547 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 2.3 19 129 79 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
43% Average
Read 408
Write 338
Mixed 311
SusWrite 105
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 11.9
53% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 44.2
47% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43%
Great: 55%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
0GB free
Firmware: 0001YAM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 64.6
Write 57.7
Mixed 46.7
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 61%
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45
414GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 133 133 135 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 149
Write 143
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 133
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC Hynix 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 12 60 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-H410M S2 V3 Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2 V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback