MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory69 GB free of 80 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 12:02
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 828
85% 688 Pts
64-Core 885
55% 885 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.7% Very good
Lighting 91
Reflection 91.3
Parallax 83.3
74% 88.5 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 72.5
70% 87.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ant Esports 690 NEO SATA 2TB
269GB free
Firmware: SN14376
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 192 192 192 191 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 347
Write 367
Mixed 331
SusWrite 193
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 33
118% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 188
138% 181 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 101%
Ant Esports 690 NEO SATA 2TB
457GB free
Firmware: SN14376
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 204 204 202 201 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 319
Write 364
Mixed 335
SusWrite 201
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 34.7
127% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 183
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 101%
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s45 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 764 786 786 583 403 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,912
Write 791
Mixed 787
SusWrite 584
224% 1,018 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 53.7
199% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 378
291% 387 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 191%
Great: 278%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
443GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3658 3892 2451 974 950 961 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
363% Outstanding
Read 1926
Write 2191
Mixed 2185
SusWrite 2,148
478% 2,112 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 87.1
307% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,476
DQ Write 1,224
DQ Mixed 1,336
1,004% 1,345 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 363%
Great: 486%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
475GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 108 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 113
Write 95.4
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 107
126% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U320032G16A-CBK20 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 AX4U320032G16A-CBK20 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 79GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
32767, 8192, 32767, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 32.7
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 32.2
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 144 23.8" 1920 1009 SAM7311 S24C31x
Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $993
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback