Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 375%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 474%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 132%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics298% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive436% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 09:48
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700KF-$376
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 231
2-Core 462
135% 261 Pts
4-Core 917
8-Core 1,814
161% 1,365 Pts
64-Core 3,764
233% 3,764 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$977
Asus(1043 8964) ≥ 4GB; asus rog
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
298% Outstanding
Lighting 452
Reflection 433
Parallax 457
368% 447 fps
MRender 517
Gravity 390
Splatting 258
303% 388 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 298%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO XT 1TB
578GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3439 937 893 891 920 904 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
436% Outstanding
Read 3,086
Write 4580
Mixed 2,991
SusWrite 1,331
676% 2,997 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 354
4K Mixed 137
469% 187 MB/s
DQ Read 2,176
DQ Write 1,680
DQ Mixed 2,042
1,496% 1,966 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 436%
Great: 507%
Corsair MP600 PRO XT 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: EIFM31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4038 3967 2580 2608 2829 2479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
519% Outstanding
Read 2,652
Write 4,290
Mixed 3,020
SusWrite 3,083
740% 3,261 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 306
4K Mixed 122
421% 165 MB/s
DQ Read 2,358
DQ Write 1,873
DQ Mixed 2,110
1,581% 2,114 MB/s
Poor: 279%
This bench: 519%
Great: 611%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 484 488 487 489 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 481
Mixed 395
SusWrite 486
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 59.9
214% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 344
259% 346 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 245 245 244 244 243 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 307
Mixed 335
SusWrite 268
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 53.5
197% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 226
202% 306 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 112%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 7200 C34 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6800 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
213% Outstanding
MC Read 91
MC Write 81.4
MC Mixed 81.1
241% 84.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 53.4
SC Mixed 35.4
109% 38.2 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 144%
This bench: 213%
Great: 250%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 0P 3R 6G 19B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 22% 54 216 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 AUS3220 ASUS XG32VC
History: Score 30: 0P 4R 1G 7B | Score 43: 0P 5R 3G 9B | Score 52: 0P 3R 6G 19B
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 3,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 297%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 390%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,404
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback