Asus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive369% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 09:35
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$375
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 225
2-Core 452
130% 254 Pts
4-Core 910
8-Core 1,736
157% 1,323 Pts
64-Core 3,608
223% 3,608 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 246
Reflection 221
Parallax 214
200% 227 fps
Gravity 161
Splatting 131
128% 146 fps
Poor: 139% Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2325 2194 1486 1513 1509 1520 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 2,158
Mixed 1,840
SusWrite 1,758
464% 2,068 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 93.5
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,630
DQ Write 1,250
DQ Mixed 1,421
1,068% 1,434 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 369%
Great: 410%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
39GB free
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 259 258 257 258 258 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 462
Mixed 365
SusWrite 277
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 45.9
155% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 233
205% 308 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 118%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 458 461 455 460 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 470
Mixed 450
SusWrite 456
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 51
165% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 342
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 136%
Samsung 990 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$156
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0B2QKXJ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3250 2709 979 958 1014 975 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 2,531
Write 3,475
Mixed 2,426
SusWrite 1,648
569% 2520 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 96
336% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,727
DQ Write 1,248
DQ Mixed 1,465
1,100% 1,480 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 372%
Great: 424%
HP EX900 1TB
753GB free
Firmware: S0614B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 723 381 386 310 380 313 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,396
Write 1,464
Mixed 1,017
SusWrite 416
240% 1,073 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 39.5
223% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 1,026
DQ Mixed 584
544% 835 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 189%
Great: 259%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 133 133 134 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 177
Write 172
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 133
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.9
350% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 110%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
178GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 129 130 131 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 133
Write 130
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 130
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3040F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
194% Outstanding
MC Read 81.2
MC Write 74.6
MC Mixed 74
219% 76.6 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 52.7
SC Mixed 34.9
104% 36.5 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 194%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2785 VG27B
Typical ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 4,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $2,391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback