To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190708
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 17 '24 at 09:32
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 76.5 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 168 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 237 39% 279 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 845B) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.82 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 17.5 Reflection 24 Parallax 19.8 14% 20.4 fps	MRender 27.7 Gravity 24.4 Splatting 20.6 20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 421 426 422 205 26 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 418 Write 393 Mixed 333 SusWrite 303 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 27.4 97% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 167 156% 239 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 537GB 1,079 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 270GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 126 127 126 126 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 111 Write 99.8 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 124 72% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	47.7% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	3	457	394	60	18.5"	1280 720	HKC1850

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	724x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	282x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	269x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	619x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	307x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16