Gigabyte GA-B460M DS3H V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B460MDS3HV2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B460M DS3H V2  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201221
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 07:31
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 208
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 716
69% 566 Pts
64-Core 852
53% 852 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
PNY(196E 136F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 194
Parallax 132
123% 159 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 120
Splatting 107
101% 126 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 112%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 762 423 181 179 175 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,976
Write 1,073
Mixed 1,226
SusWrite 308
254% 1,146 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 23
97% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 453
366% 531 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 152%
Great: 300%
Amd-raid WDC WDS480G2G0A- 480GB
75GB free
Firmware: UG220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 81 58 59 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 359
Write 99.9
Mixed 156
SusWrite 66.5
126% 170 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 7
1,522% 9.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 124%
Great: 179%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
334GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 115 119 117 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 124
Write 128
Mixed 100
SusWrite 116
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
208GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 97 93 97 95 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 121
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 96.9
73% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
67.3% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 22.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 17.6
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 23 144 24" 1280 720 GSM5B73 24GL600F
Typical GA-B460M DS3H V2 Builds (Compare 3,376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B460M DS3H V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $402
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback