MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics237% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
27 days ago, 26 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 06:58
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 69.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 268
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 904
83% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,326
82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
Gainward(10B0 F299) ≥ 4GB; Gainward Panther 4070TI
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
237% Outstanding
Lighting 343
Reflection 338
Parallax 361
280% 348 fps
MRender 476
Gravity 295
Splatting 213
255% 328 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 237%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,296
Write 185
Mixed 1,228
268% 1,236 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 68.3
224% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 712
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 600
444% 592 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
50GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 188 192 188 167 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 364
Write 363
Mixed 290
SusWrite 180
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 38.1
127% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 140
126% 193 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75%
Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
366GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 189 194 201 220 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 368
Write 362
Mixed 345
SusWrite 201
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 45.1
145% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 222
166% 221 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
19GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,216
Write 1,681
Mixed 1,632
409% 1,843 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 64.4
217% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 724
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 617
459% 614 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 27.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 25.6
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 0R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 18% 33 190 13 165 34.1" 3440 1377 SAM711A LC34G55T
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback