Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-X9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15-X9  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190423
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 06:42
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 171
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 296
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Gigabyte(1458 1658) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.1% Very good
Lighting 86.1
Reflection 90.6
Parallax 102
70% 93 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 86.3
Splatting 80.1
79% 99.2 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 94%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 1658) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 6.2
4% 6.37 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 8.6
6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKW010T8 1TB
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 989 862 719 964 542 592 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 2015
Write 1,376
Mixed 1,238
SusWrite 778
301% 1,352 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 53.6
169% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 493
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 156
160% 271 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 196%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 24.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 23.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 30 40" 1280 720 OPD3200 HDMI3
Typical GA-AERO 15-X9 Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-X9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback