Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 221%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 206%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics220% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive413% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 06:36
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 318
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 979
97% 791 Pts
64-Core 1,205
75% 1,205 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$595
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
220% Outstanding
Lighting 308
Reflection 327
Parallax 381
251% 339 fps
MRender 457
Gravity 267
Splatting 217
245% 314 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 220%
Great: 235%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3324 3195 3352 2506 1655 1650 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
413% Outstanding
Read 3,092
Write 3,656
Mixed 3,012
SusWrite 2,614
698% 3,093 MB/s
4K Read 86.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 90.4
303% 94.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,369
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 446
418% 684 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 413%
Great: 521%
XPG GAMMIX S5 512GB
45GB free
Firmware: V9002s65
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1944
Write 958
Mixed 877
276% 1,260 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 39.7
146% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 379
259% 321 MB/s
Poor: 87% Great: 289%
XPG GAMMIX S5 512GB
274GB free
Firmware: V9002s85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 942 971 955 801 425 320 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,930
Write 912
Mixed 847
SusWrite 736
245% 1,106 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 35.2
136% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 309
205% 245 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 173%
Great: 289%
Ant Esports 690 NEO SATA 512GB
295GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 420 321 115 98 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79% Very good
Read 510
Write 397
Mixed 404
SusWrite 241
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 22.3
122% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 37.3
67% 133 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 KF3200C16D4/8GX Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 32GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
113% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 38.7
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 32.8
98% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 23.8" 1280 720 VSC3B3B XG2431
Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $841
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback