MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231010
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 05:02
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 175
2-Core 349
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 686
8-Core 1,281
117% 983 Pts
64-Core 2,264
140% 2,264 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 91.8
55% 74.8 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 76.6
Splatting 48
50% 63.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 430 425 402 428 433 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 379
Write 459
Mixed 382
SusWrite 425
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 51.1
166% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 162
180% 305 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 250GB-$77
18GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 102 68 42 53 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 323
Write 192
Mixed 155
SusWrite 69.6
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 22
108% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 134
127% 206 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
386GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 93 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 92.7
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 91.1
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 56.8
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 41.9
133% 46.5 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 37.4
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 125%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 0R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 24% 42 213 58 60 27" 1280 720 AUS27DA ASUS VY279
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 1,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7C91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $539
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback