Asus EB1036

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus EB1036  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK EB1036
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 04:59
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 42.8
28% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 80.7
8-Core 80.1
11% 80.4 Pts
64-Core 79.1
5% 79.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 75 72 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 88.6
Write 81.5
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 73.9
50% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 54%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 32GB
19GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.8 10 10 9.8 9.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 100
Write 8.4
Mixed 7
SusWrite 9.7
27% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Mixed 0
126% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 18 60 27" 1280 720 ACR0B77 KA272 E
Typical EB1036 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Asus EB1036

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback