bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

27 days ago, 27 days ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DH61WW
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121105
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 17 '24 at 04:50
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$198 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 164 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 385 43% 337 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.1% Above average	Lighting 62.5 Reflection 63 Parallax 83.4 51% 69.6 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 71.6 Splatting 45.7 48% 61 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 202 Write 143 Mixed 107 33% 151 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 9.1 44% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 56.4 DQ Write 18.5 DQ Mixed 19.7 19% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$27 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 338GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 120 117 117 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 150 Write 140 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 119 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 8G1600CL11 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.9% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 13.8 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	46	15	60	22"	1280 720	ACR0009 Acer X223W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,054x
Core i7-2600Intel $198Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,581x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	947x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	827x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	521x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	379x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	299x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48