Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 255%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 261%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics248% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
27 days ago, 27 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 04:48
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 184
2-Core 374
112% 214 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,164
112% 924 Pts
64-Core 1,731
107% 1,731 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 106%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$792
MSI(1462 513D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3330 MHz, MLim: 5405 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
248% Outstanding
Lighting 357
Reflection 388
Parallax 406
291% 384 fps
MRender 480
Gravity 331
Splatting 237
273% 349 fps
Poor: 233%
This bench: 248%
Great: 265%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
825GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2176 2223 2195 2284 1654 1599 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
374% Outstanding
Read 2,444
Write 2,128
Mixed 2,277
SusWrite 2,022
499% 2,218 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 74.3
248% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1882
DQ Write 1,550
DQ Mixed 1,719
1,286% 1,717 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 374%
Great: 435%
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 256 207 96 115 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 478
Write 205
Mixed 332
SusWrite 178
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 34.2
138% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 181
160% 238 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 96%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
272GB free
Firmware: SN07151 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1946 1012 398 375 315 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,660
Write 2,161
Mixed 1,902
SusWrite 710
363% 1,608 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 63.6
211% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,762
DQ Write 1,310
DQ Mixed 636
720% 1,236 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 243%
Great: 310%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2E6000C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 72.8
MC Write 58
MC Mixed 62.4
184% 64.4 GB/s
SC Read 55.9
SC Write 69.7
SC Mixed 56.5
173% 60.7 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 178%
Great: 198%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 240 31.5" 2560 1440 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback