MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive377% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240402
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 04:47
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 141
2-Core 277
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,057
95% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,424
88% 1,424 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 200
Parallax 193
191% 209 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 147
Splatting 130
129% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 156%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3338 2756 1306 1352 1340 1348 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 2640
Write 4,550
Mixed 3,323
SusWrite 1,907
704% 3,105 MB/s
4K Read 80.5
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 111
365% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,029
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 934
693% 921 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 377%
Great: 592%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
514GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1059 491 495 493 487 949 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1340
Write 468
Mixed 561
SusWrite 662
167% 758 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 50.8
190% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 537
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 430
386% 575 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 181%
Great: 311%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
690GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 108 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 132
Write 129
Mixed 76
SusWrite 106
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 35
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 32.9
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 3R 7G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 10% 30 214 57 144 27" 2560 1440 ACI27A8 ASUS MG278
History: Score 3: 0P 0R 0G 3B | Score 43: 0P 3R 7G 7B
Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $993
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback