Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 03:39
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 515
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.6% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 61.2
47% 62.5 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 54.3
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 54%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 3
3% 3.07 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 289 317 397 264 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 461
Write 436
Mixed 394
SusWrite 327
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 26.1
85% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 320
238% 316 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
121GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 238 236 236 237 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.7% Good
Read 250
Write 237
Mixed 218
SusWrite 237
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 30.4
97% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 83 84 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 131
Write 84
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 83.1
58% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.6
318% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST16000NT001-3LV101 16TB
10TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 242 243 239 244 239 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 35% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $593
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback