Ibuypower 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-13100F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIbuypower 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-13100F  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star PRO B660M-A CEC WIFI DDR4 V2 (MS-7D37)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 03:07
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-13100F-$72
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 11.7
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 170
42% 88.1 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 724
61% 524 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 101%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M371 500GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMF0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.2 6.8 6.2 7.2 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 598
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 6.5
32% 154 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.18278S.00E 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 6.7
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 3.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 7 64 0" 2560 1369
Typical 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-13100F Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Ibuypower 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-13100F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 139% - Outstanding Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback