Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 01:19
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$365
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 206
2-Core 408
118% 230 Pts
4-Core 780
8-Core 1,441
133% 1,111 Pts
64-Core 2,675
166% 2,675 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 111%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 870A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 144
Parallax 144
120% 145 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 122
Splatting 110
108% 135 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 155 135 129 139 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 1,346
Write 732
Mixed 150
SusWrite 146
129% 593 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 40.5
138% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 562
DQ Mixed 155
196% 338 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 125%
Great: 236%
Patriot P300 1TB
113GB free
Firmware: U0204A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 4.9 799 152 253 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,631
Write 1,486
Mixed 997
SusWrite 274
244% 1,097 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 23.6
222% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 994
DQ Mixed 413
453% 754 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 186%
Great: 253%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
893GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 462 451 450 465 461 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 466
Mixed 437
SusWrite 457
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 35.8
118% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 271
199% 266 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 140 140 141 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 80
Write 115
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 139
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
148% Outstanding
MC Read 59
MC Write 50.2
MC Mixed 51.5
153% 53.6 GB/s
SC Read 43.3
SC Write 57.3
SC Mixed 49.3
143% 50 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 148%
Great: 193%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27" 2560 1369 ACI27EC ROG PG279Q
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback