HP 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A1D
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230824
Uptime13.4 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 22:41
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 62.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 277
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 599
62% 500 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8A1D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 16
Reflection 19
Parallax 19.1
13% 18 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 14.2
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1127 1486 652 1448 617 1012 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,074
Write 2,251
Mixed 1,497
SusWrite 1057
334% 1,470 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 64
245% 95.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1197
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 877
676% 934 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 225%
Great: 270%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44CB0-CWE Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.5% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 19.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO499F
Typical 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback