Ibuypower 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-13400F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 26 days ago.
SystemIbuypower 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-13400F  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star PRO B660M-A CEC WIFI DDR4 V2 (MS-7D37)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230717
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 19:49
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 60.8
1-Core 168
2-Core 332
96% 187 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 962
97% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,521
94% 1,521 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
MSI(1462 397D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 94.9
Parallax 119
112% 117 fps
MRender 78.6
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 82.6
70% 85.5 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,519
Write 1,798
Mixed 1,310
345% 1,542 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 75.8
232% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,192
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 836
650% 905 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMGD480E82-3200D 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 25
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 67%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA7 MSI G273
Typical 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-13400F Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

System: Ibuypower 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-13400F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback