Gigabyte GA-G5 MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
27 days ago, 27 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 MD  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211005
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 17:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
89% 169 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 617
71% 551 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 5015) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5244
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.4% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 50.9
Parallax 25.9
31% 38.4 fps
MRender 72.9
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 63.1
55% 68.1 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA6-8D512 512GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ER23401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 394 388 396 369 364 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,819
Write 1,123
Mixed 570
SusWrite 382
266% 1,223 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 68
261% 98.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,100
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 541
448% 665 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 248%
Great: 389%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 29.4
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 17.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 1R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 23% 26 184 4 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08B3
Typical GA-G5 MD Builds (Compare 821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback