Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 17:09
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$109
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 70.5
1-Core 157
2-Core 309
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 832
86% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,029
64% 1,029 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 258
Reflection 240
Parallax 250
210% 249 fps
MRender 330
Gravity 229
Splatting 181
194% 247 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 184%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 185 162 172 170 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 488
Mixed 401
SusWrite 208
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 55.6
187% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 369
278% 373 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
142GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 482 483 490 411 265 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 489
Mixed 464
SusWrite 435
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 56.4
190% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
204GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 187 81 83 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 490
Mixed 445
SusWrite 166
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 53.7
182% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
95GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,518
Write 2,479
Mixed 2,350
547% 2,449 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 88.2
284% 96.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,136
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 1,006
763% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 27.2
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 24.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F58 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $939
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback