MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 16:22
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 906
84% 699 Pts
64-Core 1277
79% 1277 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 215
Parallax 206
191% 219 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 157
Splatting 139
133% 167 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 157%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 35 34 34 35 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 3,746
Write 42.8
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 33.3
204% 978 MB/s
4K Read 422
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 6.1
648% 143 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 324%
Great: 280%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
232GB free
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 143 181 224 211 218 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 476
Mixed 343
SusWrite 211
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 44.9
148% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 340
265% 362 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95%
Great: 114%
Samsung 980 1TB
612GB free
Firmware: 1B4Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 203 237 298 319 349 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 121 136 164 159 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 158
Write 166
Mixed 70
SusWrite 149
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
735GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 96 105 122 125 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 117
Write 125
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 115
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZKW F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZKW F4-3200C16-8GTZRX 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.8% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 21.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 23
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 31.5" 1280 720 HSP0000 HG324QJB
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback