Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime32.5 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 22:54
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 997
92% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,502
93% 1,502 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 196
Parallax 245
165% 214 fps
MRender 249
Gravity 211
Splatting 164
165% 208 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 152%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,812
Write 864
Mixed 499
230% 1,058 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 41.9
166% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 1,023
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 749
574% 790 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
271GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2213 2071 1549 1562 1559 1554 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,393
Write 2,276
Mixed 2,222
SusWrite 1,751
486% 2,161 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 81
259% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,102
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 986
742% 996 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 328%
Great: 488%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
704GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 166 167 181 180 185 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 80
SusWrite 176
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 22.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 26.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 180 31.5" 2560 1377 GSM776F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback