Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 9SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R3  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime16.6 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 18:55
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 238
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 618
65% 520 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 127E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2127
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 34
5% 16.6 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 0.3
4% 6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 724 421 413 401 390 378 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 2,087
Write 1,413
Mixed 1,279
SusWrite 454
290% 1,308 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 54.9
180% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 419
DQ Mixed 459
363% 510 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 191%
Great: 296%
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
13GB free
Firmware: UG220400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 412
Write 336
Mixed 209
70% 319 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 6.7
41% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 32.9
43% 77.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 60%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
96GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 64 69 63 40 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 137
Write 5.5
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 57.1
68% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
123% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX426S15IB2/16 KHX2666C15S4/16G 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 1R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 18% 39 205 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO76A8
Typical MS-16R3 Builds (Compare 2,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback