Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 18:54
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 728
74% 600 Pts
64-Core 978
61% 978 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 115
Parallax 171
132% 149 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
115% 146 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 121%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 240GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 172 33 116 49 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 490
Write 301
Mixed 349
SusWrite 101
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 37.1
150% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 197
176% 263 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 91%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
931GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2474 2482 2482 2390 2236 1716 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 2,523
Write 2,520
Mixed 2,386
SusWrite 2,296
548% 2,431 MB/s
4K Read 71.9
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 98
316% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,173
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 1,023
773% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 386%
Great: 477%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
98GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 140 141 140 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 145
Mixed 114
SusWrite 142
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 26.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 29.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 5 75 21.5" 1280 720 ACR0757 EK220Q
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback