Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 18:20
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700KF-$205
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,001
94% 781 Pts
64-Core 1,423
88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 185
Parallax 190
153% 188 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 162
Splatting 134
134% 168 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 137%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 841 717 641 653 624 711 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,427
Write 2,032
Mixed 1,726
SusWrite 698
384% 1,721 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 69.4
227% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,199
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 1,004
737% 977 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 253%
Great: 346%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
125GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 476 473 477 480 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 482
Mixed 436
SusWrite 476
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 48.8
164% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 349
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
303GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 81 80 83 80 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 5.5
Write 30.5
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 79
31% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 21.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 1R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 100 34" 1280 720 XMI3444 Mi Monitor
Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback