MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
25 days ago, 4 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240308
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 15:08
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 323
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 933
96% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700
XFX(1EAE 661A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 134
Parallax 225
92% 158 fps
MRender 216
Gravity 119
Splatting 192
145% 176 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231050WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,522
Write 1,656
Mixed 1,299
334% 1,492 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 60.2
200% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,209
DQ Write 710
DQ Mixed 933
702% 950 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 226%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
275GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 64 61 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 88.4
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 62.8
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IRP3600D4V64L18S/8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 36.6
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 39
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 165 27" 1280 720 GMB0279 GB-2709FF
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 1,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback