Asus PRIME H310M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-K  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 14:46
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 712
75% 599 Pts
64-Core 714
44% 714 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 59.4
49% 62.1 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 52.5
48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W-128G-1006 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 496
Write 416
Mixed 160
79% 357 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 44
148% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 214
171% 241 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
108GB free
Firmware: V8X01c62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 365 365 369 368 236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 396
Write 368
Mixed 337
SusWrite 345
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 33
117% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 176
134% 175 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 15.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 16.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 18.9" 1280 720 LCDE980 LCD-MONITOR
Typical PRIME H310M-K Builds (Compare 2,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback