PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Q77M-D2H (all builds) |
Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130614 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 15 '24 at 14:25 |
Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
Run User | TWN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
HP(103C 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 552.22
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
11% 13.4 fps
|
11% 13 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Transcend JM1600KLN-4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
57.4%
Above average
|
56% 19.8 GB/s
|
50% 17.3 GB/s
|
62% 65.1 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 57 | 60 | 0" | 1280 720 | Default |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 35x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 34x |
Core i5-3570SIntelBench 70%, 3,597 samples | 17x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 25x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |