User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemERYING
MotherboardERYING Intel AIder Lake PCH B660 M-ATX G660
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 10:24
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User NGA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 52.2
1-Core 170
2-Core 271
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 761
70% 588 Pts
64-Core 1,382
86% 1,382 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 56.5
Parallax 50.9
42% 53 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 47.1
Splatting 44.2
40% 50 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600 1TB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 147 205 149 298 677 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 19.1
Write 633
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 304
56% 243 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 18.7
133% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 405
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 2.9
93% 226 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Cuso YX4U2666D19321C 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.7% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 7.7
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 0 100 34" 1280 720 SAM0F1D C34J79x
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback