MSI A320M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardMSI A320M/ac  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 08:57
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 253
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 662
68% 546 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1264 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 79
47% 65.1 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 43.1
44% 55.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$60
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 123 118 112 101 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 449
Write 382
Mixed 316
SusWrite 125
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 6.1
58% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 89.2
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 2.4
26% 60 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
817GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 177 173 175 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 170
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 174
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 32.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 28.1
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 9 60 21.7" 1920 1017 SAC952D LED MONITOR
Typical A320M/ac Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback