Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 08:25
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 800
79% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,265
78% 1,265 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2835 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 198
Parallax 178
136% 181 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 181
Splatting 130
122% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 823 620 621 622 623 618 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1447
Write 1,334
Mixed 1,174
SusWrite 654
258% 1,152 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 76.2
250% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 711
DQ Mixed 771
586% 794 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 212%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
5GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8761
Write 6177
Mixed 6,924
1,618% 7,287 MB/s
4K Read 402
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 271
1,071% 297 MB/s
DQ Read 1,234
DQ Write 771
DQ Mixed 898
698% 968 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB
140GB free
Firmware: 04.01G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 44 44 38 44 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 50.4
Write 42.7
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 41.9
31% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 34%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
325GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 140 138 143 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 104
Write 128
Mixed 74
SusWrite 148
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 106%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
128GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 87 87 86 82 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 75.9
Write 65.2
Mixed 47
SusWrite 84.7
92% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 34.4
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 29.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 193 12 60 23.8" 1920 1057 DEL4148 DELL U2419H
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback