MSI H310M PRO-D PLUS (MS-7C10)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C10
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-D PLUS (MS-7C10)  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 08:04
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 267
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 759
81% 644 Pts
64-Core 763
47% 763 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 261
Parallax 164
130% 195 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 167
Splatting 121
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$60
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 45 2 38 4 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 444
Write 372
Mixed 230
SusWrite 68
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 18.2
71% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 89.9
DQ Mixed 42.1
48% 83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
13GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 104 105 103 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 194
Write 151
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 104
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU880-26N1900 0898 ED48GU881-26N190E 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 23.6
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 25.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 240 25" 1280 720 INN2500 TFG25F24T
Typical H310M PRO-D PLUS (MS-7C10) Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-D PLUS (MS-7C10)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback