HP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8455
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 00:42
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2174G
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 263
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 709
77% 609 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P630
HP(103C 8455) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 8
5% 7.53 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 12.7
8% 8.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00BTW 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1142 1133 1176 1115 985 450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,488
Write 1,209
Mixed 1,124
SusWrite 1,000
270% 1,205 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 68.3
228% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 933
DQ Write 627
DQ Mixed 800
592% 786 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 226%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 25" 1280 720 DEL413A DELL U2518D
Typical Z2 Tower G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: HP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback