Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1502ZA
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 20:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 62.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 288
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 612
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1D52) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4644
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
9.14% Terrible
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 14.4
10% 14.1 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 4.8
7% 9.47 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.14%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00BTW 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1003 1157 1120 1078 1078 414 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,310
Write 1,154
Mixed 1,055
SusWrite 975
252% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 88.3
293% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,001
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 801
648% 915 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 247%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 1R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 19% 48 47 5 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0C02
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback