Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 26 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 19:56
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 786
75% 618 Pts
64-Core 1,138
70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 103
Parallax 155
83% 120 fps
MRender 88.7
Gravity 117
Splatting 73.8
75% 93.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S5 1TB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001b31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 718 723 635 98 210 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,244
Write 748
Mixed 765
SusWrite 408
176% 791 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 39.8
147% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 478
334% 409 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 137%
Great: 284%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
412GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 128 125 127 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 108
Write 95
Mixed 51
SusWrite 126
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.7% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 26.9
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 0P 4R 4G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 26% 78 211 59 144 27" 2048 1152 GSM5BB4 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $547
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback