Asrock B85 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B85 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1824 x 1014 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 19:15
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 174
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 331
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.2% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 46.6
Parallax 41.7
37% 44.6 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 36.7
32% 38.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 347 380 395 343 335 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 189
Write 101
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 344
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 35.8
133% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 202
180% 268 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 102%
Firm S11 240GB
103GB free
Firmware: SBFK71W1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 359 393 406 361 354 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 466
Mixed 434
SusWrite 358
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 64.6
213% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 297
226% 305 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 120%
Great: 149%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
623GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 184 189 192 179 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 174
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 181
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
254GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 160 167 165 160 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 140
Mixed 80
SusWrite 163
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 1302 1866 CL10 Series 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 16 60 23" 1280 720 ACI23E1 ASUS VX239
Typical B85 Pro4 Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock B85 Pro4 - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback