Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory117.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 17:36
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$500
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 65.9
1-Core 208
2-Core 407
115% 227 Pts
4-Core 816
8-Core 1,542
140% 1,179 Pts
64-Core 3,554
220% 3,554 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 184
Parallax 176
137% 176 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 170
Splatting 122
113% 140 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 123%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$320
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,326
Write 4,142
Mixed 3,256
733% 3,241 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 75.1
246% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,557
DQ Write 1,105
DQ Mixed 1,328
993% 1,330 MB/s
Poor: 315% Great: 616%
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
169GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,002
Write 3633
Mixed 3,080
726% 3,238 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 82.5
259% 90.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,799
DQ Write 1240
DQ Mixed 1,608
1,176% 1,549 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 614%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3040G324x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (85th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
163% Outstanding
MC Read 104
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 51.2
182% 63.8 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 36.8
102% 35.8 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 163%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 34.1" 1280 720 DELA0DF DELL U3417W
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 411%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback