Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Laptop Studio  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Laptop Studio
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2400 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231206
Uptime21.2 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 15:36
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 31
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 158
45% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 471
45% 374 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Microsoft(1414 0045) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 27.7
20% 26.8 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 21.1
20% 25.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ9LQ512HALU-00000 512GB
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV72M0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 591 601 556 595 578 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 339
Write 583
Mixed 432
SusWrite 583
110% 484 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 26.4
87% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 598
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 354
268% 374 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 59.1
MC Mixed 38.5
128% 44.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 10.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 109%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 51 120 14.3" 1280 720 SHP1509 LQ144P1JX01
Typical Surface Laptop Studio Builds (Compare 2,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback