Alienware m16 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive416% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m16 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0P9YG5
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240222
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 15:28
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 57.4
1-Core 196
2-Core 325
100% 193 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 1,151
100% 854 Pts
64-Core 1,969
122% 1,969 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Dell(1028 0C91) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5382
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 54
25% 34.8 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.7
6% 9.13 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9A1 Samsung 1024GB
542GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36310229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3095 3373 2498 1488 1551 1559 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
416% Outstanding
Read 2,948
Write 3,682
Mixed 2,983
SusWrite 2,261
670% 2,968 MB/s
4K Read 80.1
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 107
357% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1249
DQ Write 926
DQ Mixed 1,058
799% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 416%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 63.7
MC Write 47.2
MC Mixed 52
155% 54.3 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 138%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 9 240 16" 2048 1209 AUO75AB B160QAN
Typical m16 R2 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO

System: Alienware m16 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback