Asrock Z370 Killer SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 25 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Killer SLI  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 15:10
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 291
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,133
101% 853 Pts
64-Core 1,553
96% 1,553 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.5% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 113
Parallax 107
100% 114 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 109
Splatting 106
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1045 799 797 796 776 779 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,714
Write 2,042
Mixed 1,380
SusWrite 832
335% 1,492 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 91.1
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,177
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 981
730% 978 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 259%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
224GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 302 302 302 302 302 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 485
Mixed 378
SusWrite 321
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 64.6
221% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
594GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 177 176 177 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 121
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 176
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
800GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 148 148 150 147 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 144
Write 173
Mixed 78
SusWrite 146
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 859B BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 859B BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 859B BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 26.4
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 28.5
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 144 23.5" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix MAG24C
Typical Z370 Killer SLI Builds (Compare 601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Killer SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $614
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback