Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory32.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime7 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 15:09
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$188
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 170
2-Core 337
105% 197 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,142
108% 897 Pts
64-Core 1,499
93% 1,499 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 135% Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
730GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 417 414 416 420 383 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 438
Mixed 364
SusWrite 409
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 44.5
154% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 203
157% 216 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 137%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
1TB free
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3650 3788 3770 3791 3859 3897 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
539% Outstanding
Read 4,017
Write 2,561
Mixed 2,697
SusWrite 3,793
733% 3,267 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 87.1
297% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,398
DQ Write 1,077
DQ Mixed 1202
909% 1,226 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 539%
Great: 564%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3063 3054 3030 3049 3070 3052 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
456% Outstanding
Read 2,810
Write 3,165
Mixed 2886
SusWrite 3,053
674% 2,979 MB/s
4K Read 71.2
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 99.8
323% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,400
DQ Write 1,133
DQ Mixed 1,248
939% 1,260 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 456%
Great: 526%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 144 139 139 136 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 134
Write 149
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 142
176% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 96%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 113 114 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 110
Write 112
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 112
141% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.1
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 37
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 3R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 9% 58 196 16 120 48.8" 4096 1129 SAME028 Odyssey G95SC
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $938
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback