MSI MS-1799

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
25 days ago, 25 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE72 7RE
MotherboardMSI MS-1799  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 14:55
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 508
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6136
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7
Parallax 6.7
6% 6.8 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.9
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,028
Write 32.8
Mixed 70.5
286% 1,377 MB/s
4K Read 432
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.4
661% 146 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
690GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67.6
Write 55.5
Mixed 18.7
34% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
WD Game Drive 5TB
2TB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 79.2
Write 79.7
Mixed 52.2
88% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 64%
TOSHIBA STOR.E PARTNER 1TB
855GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 66.4
Write 42
Mixed 20
48% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.7% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1747
Typical MS-1799 Builds (Compare 1,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1799

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback