Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 11:47
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 227
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 718
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 904
56% 904 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 475D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
135% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 148
Parallax 456
118% 250 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 282
Splatting 257
193% 230 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 135%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1774 1642 1584 1513 1485 1495 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2444
Write 2,271
Mixed 1,682
SusWrite 1,582
448% 1,995 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 68.4
202% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 849
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 723
526% 692 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 288%
Great: 410%
Fanxiang S102 Pro 2TB
462GB free
Firmware: SN15628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 418 429 432 432 338 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 373
Write 476
Mixed 411
SusWrite 418
95% 419 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 39.7
142% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 287
215% 283 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 113%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
142GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 454 461 461 462 462 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 460
Mixed 407
SusWrite 459
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 45
146% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 291
240% 344 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
905GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 110 105 108 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 82.6
Write 112
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 107
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 31.5" 1280 720 ACR0CDE XV320QU M3
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback