Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 190% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 161% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	230% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '24 at 11:19
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 77.5 1-Core 146 2-Core 289 92% 171 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 653 74% 579 Pts	64-Core 696 43% 696 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$790 5,026 User benchmarks, average bench 250% Gigabyte(1458 413C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	230% Outstanding	Lighting 329 Reflection 319 Parallax 330 268% 326 fps	MRender 437 Gravity 290 Splatting 228 250% 318 fps
Poor: 233% ↑ This bench: 230% Great: 265%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDHTNG-8510B 256GB 1,412 User benchmarks, average bench 118% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80020C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 359 354 345 341 328 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 850 Write 458 Mixed 434 SusWrite 371 117% 528 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 27.3 97% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 522 DQ Write 468 DQ Mixed 421 336% 470 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 149%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 168GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 234 81 83 81 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 430 Write 413 Mixed 368 SusWrite 163 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 27.3 91% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 351 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 121%
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB 2,061 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 33GB free Firmware: FSLAN102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 377 183 130 359 236 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 410 Write 384 Mixed 383 SusWrite 278 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 23.3 72% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 302 227% 306 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 90%
WD WD20NPVT-00Z2TT0 2TB 445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 981GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 98 98 98 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 81.5 Write 79.2 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 97.3 54% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 61%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30 34,154 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 172GB free Firmware: DEM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 77 77 77 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 49.5 Write 66.5 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 77.5 39% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.4 285% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB 54,117 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 38.5 MC Mixed 27.9 99% 34.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 27.9 SC Mixed 21.5 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	1649	2	165	31.5"	1280 720	MSI4DB4 MSI G32CQ5P

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $242Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	894x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	552x
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	478x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	289x
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	246x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	206x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	150x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	136x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $545

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16