Asus PRIME A520M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-K  (all builds)
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 11:17
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$126
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 161
2-Core 314
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 911
96% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,033
64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$59
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 80 62 36 27 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 445
Write 386
Mixed 322
SusWrite 70.7
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 15.2
70% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 8.9
DQ Write 99.8
DQ Mixed 33.8
32% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 55%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$102
114GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,618
Write 2,455
Mixed 1,980
524% 2351 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 90.4
306% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1247
DQ Write 978
DQ Mixed 1,076
815% 1,100 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
840GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 168 167 168 167 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 168
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 168
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 33
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 35.3
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 1R 5G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 24% 72 209 58 240 0" 1280 720
Typical PRIME A520M-K Builds (Compare 1,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback