CDM P8Q77-M2/CDM/SI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCDM P8Q77-M2/CDM/SI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8Q77-M2/CDM/SI
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 09:03
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 95
2-Core 185
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 433
45% 361 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 62.3
Reflection 86.1
Parallax 53.5
51% 67.3 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 57.2
51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 3.9 14 3.5 17 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 556
Write 31.1
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 13.4
34% 162 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 9.8
38% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 73.3
DQ Write 17.2
DQ Mixed 17.5
20% 36 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 100%
CT240BX500SSD1 1TB
822GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 200 195 195 198 195 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 194
Write 138
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 196
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
3% 1.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27" 1920 1057 ACR06CD KG271
Typical P8Q77-M2/CDM/SI Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: CDM P8Q77-M2/CDM/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback