Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 08:58
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 155
2-Core 306
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,069
100% 832 Pts
64-Core 1,438
89% 1,438 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
XFX(1EAE 6701) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
159% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 229
Parallax 397
150% 270 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 156
Splatting 287
218% 267 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 159%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 356 350 361 361 357 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 373
Mixed 351
SusWrite 358
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 39.1
137% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 264
202% 280 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 130%
PNY CS900 480GB-$42
210GB free
Firmware: CS900913
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 221 221 221 223 222 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69% Good
Read 288
Write 254
Mixed 225
SusWrite 234
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 28.4
115% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 166
130% 181 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69%
Great: 102%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
297GB free
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1667 1668 1671 954 748 774 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,691
Write 1,721
Mixed 1,631
SusWrite 1,247
406% 1,822 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 53.6
177% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,172
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 282
301% 532 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 268%
Great: 370%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
366GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 114 109 112 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 119
SusWrite 110
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
156% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 32.5
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 35.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 69 57 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM723F SAMSUNG
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,747 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback