Asus GD30CI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus GD30CI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GD30CI
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 03:10
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 222
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 645
65% 526 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 49%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 887 712 692 640 662 633 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2232
Write 1,630
Mixed 1,402
SusWrite 704
332% 1492 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 55.4
183% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 530
391% 524 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 212%
Great: 355%
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB
74GB free
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 166 173 176 179 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
62% Good
Read 463
Write 176
Mixed 188
SusWrite 173
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 12.9
84% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 78.6
91% 157 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
74GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 111 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 155
Write 143
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 113
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 158 157 159 161 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 152
Write 106
Mixed 110
SusWrite 158
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 101%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
900GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17593
Mixed 67.6
5,842% 8,830 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 M378A1K43CB2-CRC Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.2% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 24.9
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 21.5" 1920 1080 HWP3013 HP L2206tm
Typical GD30CI Builds (Compare 595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Asus GD30CI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback